baltimoresun.com

« Today's inflation report casts store sales in different light | Main | Hopkins prof: Let investors tap government oil reserve »

June 13, 2008

Most 'negative equity' homeowners don't default

A study at the Boston Fed reports some good -- and common-sense -- news. Most people with negative equity in their houses don't walk away from the mortgage. Negative equity is when your mortgage is bigger than the value of your house -- not an uncommon situation in these days of declining house prices. But in a study of Massachusetts homeowners, the researchers found that most people in negative equity situations continue to pay their notes.

Only when there is negative equity and a cash flow problem do people default. This offers a dose of optimism in response to those who fear that widespread negative equity will necessarily cause more defaulted loans. Basically, the researchers argue that the sizable costs of defaulting on your mortgage -- credit damage, moving expenses etc. -- outweigh any hit from negative equity and induce rational homeowners to stay put. HT Calculated Risk.

Millions of Americans have negative housing equity, meaning that the outstanding balance on their mortgage exceeds their home’s current market value. Our data show that the overwhelming majority of these households will not lose their homes. Our finding is consistent with historical evidence: we examine more than 100,000 homeowners in Massachusetts who had negative equity during the early 1990s and find that fewer than 10 percent of these owners eventually lost their home to foreclosure. This result is also, contrary to popular belief, completely consistent with economic theory, which predicts that from the borrower’s perspective, negative equity is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for foreclosure. Our findings imply that lenders and policymakers face a serious information problem in trying to help borrowers with negative equity, because it is difficult to determine which borrowers actually require help in order to prevent the loss of their homes to foreclosure.
Posted by Jay Hancock at 11:26 AM | | Comments (1)
        

Comments

You have to live somewhere right?

This factoid reminds me of the auto market where most sales are based on loan payment amount rather than the car itself... if you can (or appear to be able to) afford $X/month vs $Y/month then you can "own" a Cadillac rather than the Chevy.

Better than foreclosures I suppose, but they are really missing the larger lessons.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Please enter the letter "x" in the field below:
About Jay Hancock
Jay Hancock has been a financial columnist for The Baltimore Sun since 2001. He has also been The Baltimore Sun's diplomatic correspondent in Washington and its chief economics writer. Before moving to Baltimore in 1994 he worked for The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk and The Daily Press of Newport News.

His columns appear Wednesdays and Fridays.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Resources and Sun coverage
Stay connected