« More thoughts on the Constellation settlement | Main | Document file: O'Malley-Constellation deal »

Environment Maryland: Cut carbon without harming steel mill

This email from Environment Maryland's Brad Heavner a propos of Wednesday's column on the Sparows Point steel mill:

What I dispute in your recent column on the Sparrows Point steel mill is that the global warming legislation now being debated would lead to a carbon tax covering industrial sources. You leap straight to that assumption and base the whole argument on it, but it's really not the case to begin with.

The bill is fundamentally a planning process for clean energy policies.
These policies are all things we're talking about already -- green building standards; supporting small, local power generators; transit-oriented development; energy efficiency opportunities of all sorts; dozens of small initiatives to inject a low-carbon mentality into all of our public policy. The bill sets deadlines for making decisions and getting policies in place. It will make sure our transition to a clean energy economy is smooth.

The policies developed between now and 2012 will have to result in a projected reduction in pollution of 25% from the 2006 level by 2020.
This is the course we need to be on to address the potentially devastating impacts of global warming, and doing it in ten states will spur the federal government to match it.

Can we do that without taxing manufacturing? You bet. And, as you point out, we have to.

If we impose a tax on steel that drives Severstal out of Maryland, it would result in increased greenhouse gas emissions because more of our steel would be made in places without good environmental standards and would be transported over long distances. That would make no sense. I would be the first to object.

Fortunately, there are plenty of other strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Take a look at our report from last June that offers one scenario. The Maryland Commission on Climate Change is refining details on 53 policy recommendations, and a blanket carbon tax is not one of them. (Our report is at http://www.environmentmaryland.org/reports/global-warming/global-warming
-program-reports/a-blueprint-for-action-policy-options-to-reduce-marylan
ds-contribution-to-global-warming)

It would be a great benefit to Maryland's economy to be ahead of the curve in addressing global warming. Maryland stands to create an entirely new arm to its economy and infrastructure. As the transition to clean energy occurs, we want to be part of creating it and profiting from the opportunity. The entire world is looking for solutions that Maryland can play a big role in providing.

Comments

If you drive all industry out of Maryland that will cut greenhouse gas immensely.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Please enter the letter "u" in the field below: