Another step toward forced ethanol use
Minnesota, which has required automotive fuel to contain 20 percent ethanol by 2013 (pending EPA approval), is out with a study purporting to show that such a high ethanol content will provide power similar to that of gasoline and won't hurt your car.
Be very, very skeptical. Ethanol contains much less energy than gas. E20 would cause a 3.5 percent loss of engine energy compared with that of E10, the blend sold in many gas stations now, a Minnesota State University prof has calculated. And in USA Today, car companies say using E20 might damage vehicles and void warranties:
Automakers also have doubts that it is as benign as E10. They are running trials, but they say they do not have enough data on how risky E20 is to components and whether it would change emissions in unwanted ways."Our vehicles are able to handle E10, but to move to E20 there are technical issues. It's not that simple," says Ford Motor (F) spokeswoman Kristen Kinley.
General Motors (GM) spokesman Alan Adler says that in E20 tests in Australia, "40% of the vehicles sustained (catalytic converter) damage, which allowed essentially unchecked tailpipe emissions."
"We believe there's not data sufficient to prove that all vehicles will function OK with E20," says Reg Modlin, director of environmental affairs for Chrysler. "It's not a legal fuel, and it would void the warranty."
From the Minnesota propaganda:
Increasing the amount of renewable ethanol blended into gasoline from 10 percent to 20 percent does not present problems for current vehicles or fuel dispensing equipment and provides similar power and performance, according to a new study released Wednesday by the State of Minnesota.Using 40 pairs of vehicles commonly found on American roads, a year-long research effort found that increasing ethanol blends from 10 percent (E10) to 20 percent (E20) in a gallon of gasoline provided an effective fuel across a range of tests focusing on drivability and materials compatibility.







Comments
Car companies are saying higher blends MIGHT cause damage to cars. Brazil has been running higher blends for years in their cars with no ill effects. You contend there would be a loss of 3.5% mileage compared to a 10% blend. The preliminary study surprised the ethanol industry when the results showed the most efficient blend was at 30%.
It's time to get out of bed with Big Oil and look for solutions to the energy problem rather than bashing the industry that is trying to help solve the problem. Corn ethanol is not the ultimate answer, but it is generating revenue to invest in cellulosic ethanol which could be huge. Until you can come up with something better, leave this one alone.
And I don't want to hear about the subsidies. The ethanol industry created a surplus of $1.2 Billion for the U.S treasury in 2007. Do some research, and have some facts before you bash.
Posted by: Joe | March 6, 2008 9:59 AM
Ridiculous! The solution (clean domestic biofuels) is now presented as the problem and the problem (unbridled addiction to dictator-owned fossil fuels) presented as the solution. Our children have a right to grow up in a country free of this suicidal national addiction. It is a nonsense to risk future wars, a collapsing dollar and a trillion dollar trade deficit for the benefit of a few dictators when we can manufacture home grown fuels. As the Brazilian experience shows, E20 will probably show up to be a better fuel than E10 (higher octane, cleaner burning and less emissions when idle) and it can be introduced gradually.
Posted by: Jack | March 6, 2008 11:13 PM