baltimoresun.com

« Fed official waxes hawkish on inflation, spooks market | Main | Government financial secrets unveiled: Missouri shows how »

February 6, 2008

Mandel can't believe today's productivity number

If anything, says Business Week Chief Economist Michael Mandel, today's disappointing figure for 4th-quarter productivity growth is too high.

Quite bluntly, I'm suspicious of the number. Neither companies or consumers are behaving as if productivity is rising.
Posted by Jay Hancock at 2:37 PM | | Comments (3)
        

Comments

A fair point, but I think the real interesting thing on his blog is the previous post:

"Here's a thought...maybe part of the reason the credit markets are in such bad shape because the Fed raised rates too fast and too high. Think about it--they started raising rates in June, 2004. It was a quarter point increase, from 1 to 1.25. Two years later, the Fed funds rate was up to 5.25. That's four percentage points in only two years.

And who was affected by the increase in the Fed funds rate? Well, not corporations: They saw their rates fall over this period. Conventional mortgages edged up by half a percentage point. Credit card interest rates rose by about a percentage point.

The big losers were precisely one group: Holders of adjustable rate mortgages who could not refinance into fixed rate mortgages. Did I hear someone say 'subprime'?

Basically the Fed took a sledgehammer to the subprime sector in order to slow the economy...they should not be surprised that it broke.

In retrospect it would have been better for the Fed to have stopped at 4% and waited for a while to see what happened. If we assume that it takes 12-18 months for the effect of rate changes to propagate through the economy, they basically showed too much impatience."

I definitely agree that part of the impetus for raising rates was to slow the runaway boom in the housing sector, but I'd never really thought about it in these terms. It certainly appears that rather than the "soft landing" the Fed sought to achieve, they overshot and let all the air out of the balloon.

Yeah, that is very interesting and insightful. I hadn't thought of things that way. I wonder, however, what the CPI would look like today if Bernanke hadn't been so aggressive?

Also very true, Jay (regarding CPI). Which underscores just how difficult the Fed's job is, especially in an environment where soaring commodity prices push up inflation and push down growth. The threat of stagflation looms ever larger.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About Jay Hancock
Jay Hancock has been a financial columnist for The Baltimore Sun since 2001. He has also been The Baltimore Sun's diplomatic correspondent in Washington and its chief economics writer. Before moving to Baltimore in 1994 he worked for The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk and The Daily Press of Newport News.

His columns appear Tuesdays and Sundays.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Sign up for FREE business alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for Business text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
Charm City Current
Stay connected