Harvard uses $35 billion endowment to cut tuition
What are endowments for, anyway? Harvard has long been pressured to invest some of its $35 billion endowment in making its tuition more affordable. Now it seems to have done so in a significant way, cutting the cost of attendance by as much as half for students in families making between $120,000 to $180,000 a year and by more for families making less. From Bloomberg:
These families [making 120k to 180k] will pay just 10 percent of their yearly earnings to send a child to Harvard, the Cambridge, Massachusetts, university said today. The payments decline on a sliding scale, with those making less than $60,000 attending for free. The school also eliminated student loans, saying students will get additional grants as needed.The newest initiative expands a program started in 2004, when former president Lawrence Summers added a tuition-free financial aid program for students from low-income families. The program, which begins next year, will cut costs for a family earning $180,000 to $18,000 per student, compared with $30,000 this year, according to the school.
``What you see here is a real commitment to try to identify a response to the enormous stress that a particular group of families feel about the cost of higher education,'' President Drew Faust said in a conference call. The new program focuses on a ``middle-income group,'' she said.
Excluding home equity from financial aid formulas, another part of the initiative, may save some students about $4,000 a year, according to a statement from Harvard.
Here's Senator Charles Grassley, who has been pushing for this:
“This is big news. Universities hold at least $340 billion in endowments. Harvard has the biggest endowment of all. This could inspire other expensive colleges to make tuition more affordable. Choosing a college should be based more on brain power than bank account size. As a society, we need to avoid saddling families with tuition they can’t afford and students with sky-high debts. I hope the colleges that are taking steps to reduce tuition will make the costs known up-front, so families can comparison-shop ahead of enrollment and don’t get any rude surprises afterward."I hope Congress is motivated by Harvard’s action to continue a discussion of whether to impose a mandatory endowment pay-out requirement on well-funded colleges. Colleges are tax-exempt, and other tax-exempt entities, such as most private foundations, have a mandatory pay-out requirement of 5 percent a year. Tax-exempt organizations are supposed to provide public benefit in exchange for their special status. Helping the next generation afford college is a public benefit. It’s good to see a top college recognize that.”


Comments
An analogous, perhaps bigger issue: Yes, tuition at the elite schools has consistently outstripped inflation in the last 20-30 years. Yet demand for admission has also exploded. The odds of getting into an elite school is now 1:15, or 1:20 -- in spite of the elites cleverly leveraging their superior reputation by raising the ticket price, year in and year out. To be sure, more and more of us are pursuing higher education. As a percent of the population, college grads have risen from something like less 1% in the early 1800s, to nearly 50% today. Yet have the Ivies and other "highly selectives" increased their capacity by increasing the size of their student body to answer this demand? Clearly not. It strikes me that this issue ranks with the cost/price issue for the emerging national policy debate, and Senator Grassley and his colleagues should look into as one that merits greater use of their endowment.
Posted by: Logan McK. Cheek III | December 13, 2007 12:18 PM