baltimoresun.com

« iPhones are NOT being used on Verizon, Sprint | Main | Bankers: Know your customer! »

October 25, 2007

The silver lining of real estate

The (almost) always optimistic Ed Yardeni, or Yardeni Research, on existing-home data released yesterday:

Whew! Home prices didn’t crash in September. That is single-family home prices didn’t crash, though they were down 4.9% y/y. But that’s after increasing 56% since the start of the decade and 100% since 1994 (based on 12-month ma). Condo and co-p prices actually rose 1.4% y/y.

Notwithstanding the widely feared crash scenario, existing home prices are not falling widely and wildly, not yet anyway. They were roughly unchanged in the Northeast (-0.7% y/y) and in the Midwest (+0.6%). On the other hand, it must be feeling a bit more like a crash in the West where the median existing home price dropped 9.0% y/y. In the South, it was down 5.7%. Just how much have prices in these four regions gone down from their record highs? Let’s review, using the 12-month moving averages:

(1) In the West, the median existing home peaked at $349,875 during December 2006. It is down 1.2%, after increasing 86.1% since the start of the decade.

(2) In the South, the median existing home peaked at $186,350 during July 2006. It is down 2.8%, after increasing 52.5% since the start of the decade.

(3) In the Northeast, the median existing home peaked at $285,800 during June 2006. It is down 1.1%, after increasing 80.8% since the start of the decade.
(4) In the Midwest, the median existing home peaked at $168,425 during March 2006. It is down 3.5%, after increasing 39.1% since the start of the decade.

(5) While prices in the Northeast and Midwest are down from recent peaks, both are actually showing signs of bottoming. Prices are up 1.0% in the Northeast since February, and up 0.4% since July in the Midwest.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:17 AM | | Comments (1)
        

Comments

And you believe house prices staying "inflated" is a good thing? That's like saying its a good thing for oil to cost $91 a barrel. It's good for investors & speculators, but is horrible for consumers. Also the sales mix and "kick backs" should be considered when reporting price gains YOY or MOM. I dare you to report the truth.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About Jay Hancock
Jay Hancock has been a financial columnist for The Baltimore Sun since 2001. He has also been The Baltimore Sun's diplomatic correspondent in Washington and its chief economics writer. Before moving to Baltimore in 1994 he worked for The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk and The Daily Press of Newport News.

His columns appear Tuesdays and Sundays.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Sign up for FREE business alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for Business text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
Charm City Current
Stay connected