baltimoresun.com

« ADM eyes sugar ethanol in Brazil | Main | Examiner editor insults Baltimore »

June 22, 2007

Is charity a waste of time & money?

Harvard Professor Robert Barro had a piece in the Wall Street Journal this week. The gist was: Bill Gates did a lot more for humanity by founding Microsoft and getting rich than he will by spending his $90 billion fortune on philanthropic deeds. The implication was: He really shouldn't bother trying to help the poor; markets, capitalism and policies that promote them will take care of everything.
[Gates] suggested that with a personal fortune of about $90 billion (including what he has transferred to the foundation) it is time for him to give something back. I find this perspective hard to understand... He is kidding himself if he believes that the efforts of the Gates Foundation are likely to provide society anything like the past and future accomplishments of Microsoft.
Barro suggests Gates might do just as much good by sending a $300 check to every U.S. resident. Ugghh. What junk. It is true that the economic growth caused by capitalism beginning in about the 16th century has done a million times more to alleviate poverty and advance standards of living than all government, philanthropy and foreign aid programs combined. It is true that, barring catastrophe, markets will continue to do this for a long time. It is true that many efforts at philanthropy fail miserably. But this is no reason to hide ourselves in the counting house, count our blessings and trust inertia to take care of the surplus population. Even Barro would admit markets are not perfect. Markets fail. Markets come with bottomless holes and horrible booby traps.

His recommendations to foster policies that promote markets are wise. But they are not sufficient. There is horrible suffering in the world: AIDS, malaria, starvation and poverty. Shall those with the means to alleviate them stand by and watch? Should economic efficiency leave no room for the milk of human kindness? The beauty of capitalism is that it accomplishes aggregate good through selfish motives. So be it. But it does not abolish the duty for those of us in better circumstances to try to help people directly.


Posted by Jay Hancock at 12:11 PM | | Comments (0)
        

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Please enter the letter "j" in the field below:
About Jay Hancock
Jay Hancock has been a financial columnist for The Baltimore Sun since 2001. He has also been The Baltimore Sun's diplomatic correspondent in Washington and its chief economics writer. Before moving to Baltimore in 1994 he worked for The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk and The Daily Press of Newport News.

His columns appear Wednesdays and Fridays.

Follow @jayhancock1 on Twitter
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Charm City Current
Stay connected