baltimoresun.com

« Feds may unleash electricity watchdogs | Main | Is charity a waste of time & money? »

June 22, 2007

ADM eyes sugar ethanol in Brazil

The Wall Street Journal and Reuters are reporting this morning that Archer Daniels Midland, the agriculture company that is the biggest player in the U.S. corn ethanol business, might start making sugar ethanol in Brazil. Hard to tell whether it would be a good move for ADM. But on balance it wouldn't be a bad thing for U.S. energy policy to have this politically powerful company get a financial stake in the only kind of ethanol production that seems to make sense and is now essentially banned for U.S. consumers.

Refining sugar for ethanol is much more efficient than refining corn. Raw cane has more calories than raw corn, and sugar produces much more "energy returned on energy invested" (EROEI) than corn. Even corn-ethanol fans rarely claim that it has an EROEI of more than 2. A research survey by the Natural Resources Defense Council looked at five studies that reported a corn ethanol EROEI of between 1.29 and 1.65. In other words, it takes as many as 100 units of oil, natural gas, coal or other traditional energy to produce only 129 units of so-called "renewable" corn ethanol energy. This is not going to do much to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil or fossil fuels. The juice ain't worth the squeezing. A professor at Cornell named Pimental says making ethanol consumes more energy than it produces -- a net energy loss for the economy. Sugar ethanol, on the other hand, has an EROEI of at least 3 and as high as 10 in some studies.

Brazil has successfully been making sugar ethanol for years at prices per gallon that are much lower than the present price of U.S. gasoline. But alas, Congress in its wisdom has fastened a 54-cent-a gallon tariff on any imported ethanol. If ADM gets involved in Brazil, perhaps pressure to get rid of this ridiculous law will increase. Brazilian ethanol production is not without its big downsides: Rainforest is being bulldozed to plant sugarcane. But sugar ethanol makes a lot more sense than corn ethanol, and in the right circumstances it could contribute to this country's energy future.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:05 AM | | Comments (1)
        

Comments

We found an interesting article about the problems with Ethanol on ConsumerReports.org:

http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2008/03/ethanol-e85.html

"But there are some problems with increasing ethanol blends. Ethanol contains less energy than gasoline, so increasing the amount of ethanol in gasoline will likely result in lower fuel economy. Increasing standard fuel blends from zero to 10 percent ethanol, as is happening today, has little or no impact on fuel economy. In tests, the differences occur within the margin of error, about 0.5 percent. Further increasing ethanol levels to 20 percent reduces fuel economy between 1 and 3 percent, according to testing by the DOE and General Motors. Evaluations are underway to determine if E20 will burn effectively in today's engines without impacting reliability and longevity, and also assessing potential impact on fuel economy."

TheSUBWAY.com would like to invite readers to post their own views and ideas in TheSUBWAY.com's Investor Forum:

http://www.thesubway.com/small-cap-forum

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Please enter the letter "q" in the field below:
About Jay Hancock
Jay Hancock has been a financial columnist for The Baltimore Sun since 2001. He has also been The Baltimore Sun's diplomatic correspondent in Washington and its chief economics writer. Before moving to Baltimore in 1994 he worked for The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk and The Daily Press of Newport News.

His columns appear Wednesdays and Fridays.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Resources and Sun coverage
Stay connected