Food for thought: Frankenanimals
Remember the good old days when you'd eat just any old thing without worrying about what you were popping into your mouth? Ah. Ignorance was bliss, or so we thought until we realized what all that fat, salt, trans fat and calories we were ingesting was doing to our bodies.
How many of you out there read food labels more carefully now?
How many of you buy food based on whether it's organic, or trans fat-free, or natural? I'm betting a lot more people read food labels and worry more about where their food comes from than we used to.
Anyhoo, the Food and Drug Administration issued draft guidelines last week for approving genetically engineered (GE), sometimes referred to as genetically modified (GM), produced food.
As the FDA press release on GE food explains:
Genetic engineering generally refers to the use of recombinant DNA (rDNA) techniques to introduce new characteristics or traits into an organism. When scientists splice together pieces of DNA and introduce a spliced DNA segment into an organism to give the organism new properties, it's called rDNA technology. The spliced piece of DNA is called the rDNA construct. A GE animal is one that contains an rDNA construct intended to give the animal new characteristics or traits.
GE animals can be divided into several classes, based on their intended use. They include animals that produce human or animal pharmaceuticals (biopharm animals); animals that serve as models for human diseases; animals that produce high-value industrial or consumer products, such as fibers; and food-use animals with new traits such as improved nutrition, faster growth or lower emission levels of environmentally harmful substances (such as phosphate in their manure).
Genetic engineering already is widely used in agriculture to make crops resistant to pests or herbicides. In medicine, genetic engineering is used to develop microbes that produce drugs and other therapeutic products for use in humans. In food, genetic engineering is used to produce microorganisms that aid in baking, brewing, and cheese-making.
Under the draft guidance, producers will have to demonstrate that food from the GE animal is safe to eat in cases in which the GE animal is intended for food use.
First of all, I wonder what the standards are for proving that GE animals used for food is safe? I know that the science is used to protect crops from disease and to make some animals grow faster, but I do worry about what that means for our bodies, health-wise? I'm also wondering why the FDA isn't requiring GE or GM foods to be labeled so?
Michael Hansen, PhD, senior scientist at Consumers Union, was wondering that, too, according to that medguru story:
“It’s outrageous that they would not require these things to be labeled. Come on, they require orange juice to be labeled if it’s from a concentrate vs. fresh-squeezed. Milk is labeled homogenized vs. not. That’s enough to label, but an engineered animal isn’t?”
Paul Wallis, in an opinion piece for the digitaljournal.com, says that intensive study of GM and GE foods needs to be done and more time needs to be devoted to finding a useful way for labeling such products. Consumers will want to know.
What say you? Do you care if your food was genetically altered? Would you want to see that on a label? Do you want to give the FDA your two cents? You have until Nov. 18 to comment on the draft guidelines. For more information, go to the FDA's site to read up on GE food.
And just in case you're wondering, that photo shows the Carneros wine growing region near Napa, Calif. Advancements have been made in the fight against the vine-killing disease threatening California's wine industry, including the development of grapevines genetically engineered to be resistant to it. (AP Photo)
Categories: Consumer protection, Consumer safety, Food, Healthcare, Marketing/Advertising, Technology





Comments
Yes, I very definitely read food content labels, and have become a much more discriminating food buyer because of them. And yes again, I seek out organic and whole foods. Nothing is perfect, I suppose. It is revealing to sometimes compare 'regular' full, firm healthy-looking, nicely-colored bananas with the organic variety. Sometimes the organic bananas look spindly and sick! (It takes a strong man to buy a sickly banana!)
To be honest, I am not well-informed on GE and GM foods and have some catching up to do. At the very least, the consumer deserves/needs to be fully informed, and so the requirement that GE/GM foods be so labelled is--to me--a no-brainer.
Thanks for the FDA site. I will check it out. Bon Appetite!
Posted by: Terry | September 22, 2008 4:14 PM